What does it take to bake a business?

Startups need things. Lots of things. You can't bake a company with a recipe alone. You need utensils, ingredients, an oven, a mixing bowl, and some counter space. A complicated recipe might even require an assistant chef. Some of these things are easy to find. Some of them are more elusive and expensive.

Luckily, startups have something they can barter with to acquire these things: equity in a potentially appreciating asset. In any good transaction, the startup will trade some of that equity for something that will accelerate its appreciation. The startup gets what it needs, the other party gets an instant increase in theoretical value and a shot at a real-life profit. For years, entrepreneurs and investors have been trading these things back and forth. The trade has traditionally taken the same form: Investor gives money to startup, startup gives equity to investor. This works out OK, because money is one of those things startups need and, with enough of it, they can buy all the other stuff.

But, how much sense does it really make for cooks to leave the kitchen to go shopping? Nothing is baking while the cook is at the store. Nothing is getting mixed. The oven isn't even pre-heating. That equity isn't appreciating. There are probably two types of entrepreneurs: those who will spend more and make quicker decisions so they can get back in the kitchen and those who will take their time to find the best deals. Since time is money, both are a waste.

But there is a bigger problem for real startups than for our analogous cooks. These cooks might make a trip to the store to buy ingredients before each baking project, but they wouldn't buy a new rolling pin or a new bread pan every time, and they certainly wouldn't buy new cabinets and appliances for each new loaf of bread. But this is exactly what happens in the startup world! Investors' money goes to buy new computers, lease new office space and buy new furniture for every new startup they fund. They spend money recruiting and re-locating new staff and paying lawyers to draw up new legal entities and operating agreements.

Luckily, a new breed of merchants have shown up, ready to barter with a new currency. Rather than simply trading money for equity, we deal directly in the tools and ingredients, eliminating the trip to the store so the cooks start mixing faster. Better yet, some us have learned to trade in the use of our counter tops and ovens (and even our assistant chefs), rather than trying to trade those items themselves. By reducing overhead, re-using staff and space, and recycling designs and code, we get businesses baking faster, and create a whole lot less waste.

 

 

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted 1 year ago

2 comments

Mar 16, 2009
Kevin Makice said...
I realize the emphasis of SproutBox is on web-based businesses that can be turned into a revenue stream within three months, but I'm curious about how much thought you have given to supporting projects that might take longer to cultivate. Are the needs and advantages of the tradeoffs you describe different for other classes of startups, and do you (or similar kinds of businesses as SproutBox) eventually want to take on longer-term commitments?
Mar 17, 2009
nsinsabaugh said...
Services for equity is something more firms seem to be engaging. AdaptivePath http://www.adaptivepath.com has done a particularly good job at it.

At KA+A (a Brand & UX firm in Indy), we've found it to be a great way to get involved in exciting initiatives at an early stage. More on that here: http://www.kaplusa.com/firm/ventures.shtml

One of the coolest benefits is that the service provider now has a vested interest in seeing the new business thrive. One thing to be careful of, though, is getting spread too thin. Service firms need cash to keep things running just like every other business.

Leave a comment...

 
To leave a comment on this posterous, please login by clicking one of the following.
Posterous-login     twitter